Do you think this is correct? Are trustworthly Clinton, is what the game?
By Peter Slevin and Jose Antonio Vargas, Washington Post Staff Writers Sunday, February 17th, 2008, Page A12 MILWAUKEE, Feb. 16 – Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton on Saturday urged delegates uncommitted Democratic Party to make their own decisions about whether to support his or Sen. Barack Obama, and predicted that the battle for the Democratic nomination will continue into the summer. "superdelegates are part of the process. It was supposed to have a separate trial, "said Clinton (DN.Y.), who wants to stake hundreds of delegates were elected and large contingents from Michigan and Florida, where candidates do not campaign. Clinton trails Obama (Illinois) on account of pledged delegates, awarded on the basis the results of primaries and caucuses. She said she believes superdelegates, appointed by the party, not only to anoint the candidate who leads after the primary season. My question is … Why have rules? Who are the Clintons
The Clintons are cruel … Ask the White House former postal workers, or Bill raped women and slept with the trash and then the White House postal workers are particularly worrying. The Clintons wanted to fire them and hire their friends and suporters from Arkansas, that's fine … but if they did (political patronage) I guess they thought that would look bad, so they made the charges criminal proceedings against them! The charges were ridiculous, and driven, but not to the lives of these people and their reputations were damaged trash … and for what? So the Clinton did not look bad? We also recall how Bill fired all U.S. attorneys … All 120 … and later how the Democrats in the research rant was a criminal and celebrated when Bush fired eight.
